Skip to main content

NYC new Congestion Pricing or Fees or Tax depending on which side of the fence you are on <<< Global Warming


Read on PhysOrg.com
The most controversial idea in the plan (NYC Plan 2030), from the mayor's Office of Long-term Planning and Sustainability, is a proposal to charge motorists for driving into Manhattan below 86th Street on weekdays from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Trucks would be charged $21 a day and cars would be charged $8, on top of the city's already expensive parking.

It is similar to a system that London (Congestion Charge) has used since 2003, and officials there say it has significantly reduced congestion.

The scheme applauded by environmentalists and alternative transportation groups, but is politically tricky for New York City because it would have to be enacted by the state Legislature, and many lawmakers from outer boroughs and the suburbs may not support it.

Read Full speech hear -- Click here


Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
.
We all have to wonder what Bloomberg is really thinking of with this congestion pricing tax scheme. Maybe he mostly just wants a new tax. Just wrap it up in ‘concern for the environment’, and then people can just demonize those who oppose it.

If he cares so much about traffic jams, congestion and air pollution, why does he let Park Avenue be blocked off? Why doesn’t he do anything about that?

It's true, Pershing Square Restaurant blocks Park Avenue going South at 42nd St. for about 12 hours a day/5 months of the year! This Causes Massive Congestion & Air Pollution!

But apparently it does not bother NYC’s Nanny-in-Chief Mike “Congestion Pricing Tax” Bloomberg? Check out the map!

http://whataplanet.blogspot.com
http://preview.tinyurl.com/38obfd

Check it out!

Thanks,

Little Blue PD
:)
June 28, 2007 at 10:21:00 PM PDT
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trader Joe's Business Secret Recipe

Great article on Trader Joe's Business philosophy and history. ( Saw it on Yahoo ) Some take aways from the article: >> Strike a balance between choice and customer experience " Swapping selection for value turns out not to be much of a tradeoff. Customers may think they want variety, but in reality too many options can lead to shopping paralysis. "People are worried they'll regret the choice they made," says Barry Schwartz, a Swarthmore professor and author of The Paradox of Choice. "People don't want to feel they made a mistake." Studies have found that buyers enjoy purchases more if they know the pool of options isn't quite so large. Trader Joe's organic creamy unsalted peanut butter will be more satisfying if there are only nine other peanut butters a shopper might have purchased instead of 39. Having a wide selection may help get customers in the store, but it won't increase the chances they'll buy. Read More  Learn M
Post a Comment
Read more

Google at 6 - What do analysts have to say about that

Here in an article in Yahoo Finance via cnbc Remember that old saying from the 1920s retailer, John Wanamaker ? He knew half his ad budget was wasted, now if only he knew which half. Google promised to change all that. Instead of focusing ever harder on its core-providing smarter search results and better-tailored ads for what you're looking for, thereby boosting the only real revenue stream the company has-Google has wanderlust. Goes on to compare it to Sun Microsystem Read More Fools.com evaluate Google Moat and found the following For a company in a constantly evolving industry, Google has a surprisingly sustainable series of competitive advantages over its peers. Read more about the Moats fools.com analyzed (namely Intellectual property rights. Customer switching costs, The network effect, Cost advantages) Mark Hulbert: An exclusive Google birthday party Hulbert Financial Files - MarketWatch Mark Hulbert warns it's a mistake to assume other tech IPOs will see the s
Post a Comment
Read more